Skip to content

List configured extensions and connection status in bl tools - #17

Merged
torstenrudolf merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
trudolf/bl-tools-configured-extensions
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

torstenrudolf merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
trudolf/bl-tools-configured-extensions

Conversation

@torstenrudolf

@torstenrudolf torstenrudolf commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bl tools currently displays a compiled extension catalog, so its menu can include extensions absent from the selected backend and does not show whether the caller has connected them.

Fetch the configured extensions through authenticated KGoose ListExtensions for bl tools, bl tools --help, and root --describe-commands. Keep extensions with auth_satisfied_for_caller = false visible and mark their descriptions with [not connected], including unconnected extensions with zero tools. Discovery errors propagate instead of falling back to the static catalog.

Selected-extension help and metadata also use live discovery to classify failed ListTools requests. An unconnected extension missing from the embedded catalog now produces a connection error; a name absent from the backend produces an unknown-extension error. Successful lookups require only ListTools. If discovery also fails, the error retains the original tool lookup failure.

Root listing now requires backend access and the existing BuilderLab session or Blox proxy authentication. The separately packaged sq agent-tools retains its static catalog. Update the usage documentation and cover the listing, connection labels, authentication, and failure behavior in CLI integration tests.

Use authenticated ListExtensions for BuilderLab root help and command discovery. Keep unconnected extensions visible with a status label, while retaining the static catalog for sq agent-tools.

Co-authored-by: Steve <e010611543c2fb824246457dab086b3bf8de013fcc516d0b35d88236fc254ae3@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
@torstenrudolf
torstenrudolf requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2026 00:37

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 98c7ee7c95

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/lib.rs
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-14T02:36:40.951772Z bffaef2 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Classify failed BuilderLab ListTools requests against the configured backend extensions, including selected-extension help and metadata paths. Load discovery only on failure and preserve the original error if discovery also fails. Keep sq catalog behavior unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Steve <e010611543c2fb824246457dab086b3bf8de013fcc516d0b35d88236fc254ae3@buzz.block.builderlab.xyz>
@torstenrudolf
torstenrudolf merged commit 5fd1072 into main Oct 14, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants