Skip to content

ci: use Claude Opus 5.5 for bot workflows - #556

Merged
vuanhphung merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
vu/ci-opus-5-5
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

vuanhphung merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
vu/ci-opus-5-5

Conversation

@vuanhphung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Switch all five engineer and reviewer bot workflows to Claude Opus 5.5, setting both the model endpoint and explicit model override. Matches JDBC #1741.

Validation: parsed all 14 workflow/action YAML files, verified matching endpoints and overrides with no other semantic changes, and passed git diff --check. Live bot execution was not run.


This PR was created with GitHub MCP.

Signed-off-by: Vu Anh Phung <vu.phung@databricks.com>

@peco-review-bot peco-review-bot Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verdict: 1 Nit

Looks good: the CI-only change moves all five bot workflows to Opus 5.5, and in each one the endpoint and the *_MODEL_OVERRIDE name the same model. No old opus-4-8 endpoints are left. One nit: a comment in .bot/config.yaml still names the old engine-default model.

Other findings

  • ⚪ Nit — .bot/config.yaml:129-132 still says the effective retrospective model is the engine default databricks-claude-opus-4-8[1m]. That isn't wrong, since it describes the engine default and points to ENGINEER_BOT_MODEL_OVERRIDE. Still, consider a short note that the workflows now set the override to databricks-claude-opus-5-5, so readers aren't misled about which model actually runs.

@vuanhphung
vuanhphung added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit afcad33 Oct 29, 2026
32 checks passed
@vuanhphung
vuanhphung deleted the vu/ci-opus-5-5 branch October 29, 2026 19:28

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
azure-prod — 163ac505 Deployed Oct 29, 2026 by vuanhphung via e2e-test (26.12.1, 26_12_1) #1708
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant