Repository navigation
docs: say what the AWS tenant may own and how a new kind is enabled - #62
Conversation
The eks-ci comments still described a CI Role "to be added here as a follow-up", but that Role is owned by the platform on purpose. And nothing told a contributor that a manifest for a new AWS resource kind needs the platform to activate the kind and grant this tenant permission first; without that, the release is refused and the whole tenant stops reconciling. Fixes #51 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performed
|
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
Readiness at
|
Why
The docs invited contributors to add AWS resources here without saying that a new kind of resource must first be enabled on the platform. A change like that passes this repository's checks and releases, then stops the whole AWS tenant from updating. One comment also still described a plan that was replaced.
What
The contributor and agent guides now say what this tenant may own today and the order a new kind of resource needs: the platform change first, then the manifest here. The comments describe the current ownership and why the CI role stays on the platform. No behaviour changes.
Fixes #51
🤖 Generated with Claude Code