Repository navigation
Mark PEP 836 as withdrawn - #5178
Merged
Merged
Conversation
savannahostrowski
requested review from
Fidget-Spinner and
brandtbucher
as code owners
October 19, 2026 20:36
Documentation build overview
|
Member
|
Explain briefly why? |
Member
Author
|
I've added a link to the post on DPO above but the gist of it is that carrying this work forward requires a greater time commitment than any of us have bandwidth for at the moment. |
hugovk
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2026
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
willingc
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context for why we are opting to withdraw is in https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-836-jit-go-brrr-the-path-to-a-supported-jit-compiler-for-cpython/108010/57